Legal Opinion
American Express Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Galveston
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 17, 1928No. 9153PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The statement we make of the cause is an adaption from recitations in the several briefs of the parties, without acknowledgment of what in most instances is a substantial quotation:
This is a suit by City National Bank against American Express Company and Joe Varnell on a number of "travelers' checks," alleged to be negotiable instruments within the meaning of the Negotiable Instruments Act, title 98, Revised Statutes of Texas. The Express Company was sued as drawer, drawee, and acceptor, Joe Varnell as warrantor of the title and validity thereof under section 65 of the act; it being alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CostelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Purviance v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Tower v. StanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Sabine v. PaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Linick v. A. J. Nutting & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peoples Sav. Bank v. American Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1936
- City Nat. Bank of Galveston v. American Express Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Odessa v. San Angelo Nat. Bank of San AngeloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Emerson v. American Exp. Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Venable v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.