Legal Opinion

Wiley v. . Mining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895Published

1Opinion of the Court

For the reasons given in the opinion dismissing the appeal, the motion to reinstate is denied. Every exception in the case is based upon the judgment, and that not being printed, the case when reached was not in a plight to be intelligently argued (Avery v. Pitchard, 106 N.C. 344), and the Court was compelled either to continue the cause or dismiss it. The appellee, having made the motion in writing to dismiss, was entitled to have it allowed. The requirement as to printing the parts of the record which are essential to be considered on appeal is a necessity demonstrated by the experience of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Stephens v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Avery v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Whitehurst v. . PettipherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Dunn v. . UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API