Legal Opinion
Mele v. Hill Health Center
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 2009No. 3:06cv455 (SRU)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
John P. Mele brings this civil rights action pro se and in forma pauperis. Mele’s second amended complaint asserts variously that defendants’ actions violated his rights under the Constitution and federal statutes including the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, and violated confidentiality laws concerning patient treatment records. His claims for deliberate indifference to medical needs and disclosure of medical information were dismissed on January 8, 2008 (doc.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vaughn v. Phoenix House New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Sam Friedenberg v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Baum v. Northern Dutchess HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Gates v. Black Hills Health Care SystemsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Zeranti v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.