Legal Opinion

Hall v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1947No. 34,269PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The individual defendant did not answer nor appear at the trial. The cause was heard and determined as between plaintiff and the corporate defendant only. Hereinafter we shall refer to it as the defendant. The case comes here on its appeal from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The facts upon which the verdict is based, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, may be thus summarized: Plaintiff and her friend, one Beatrice Fischer, were passengers on one of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Fitzgerald v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Fox v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCuller v. WorksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API