Legal Opinion
Rags Over the Arkansas River, Inc. v. Colorado Parks & Wildlife Board
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE DUNN
{1 No doubt Colorado is a state blessed with natural beauty. Seeking, in their view, to highlight this beauty, several years ago artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude began a quest to install a large-scale art display over the Arkansas River (the Project). Over a decade after the initial application, the Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Reere-ation (Parks Division), through its Board,1 authorized the Project.
T2 Rags Over.the Arkansas River, Inc. (ROAR), a nonprofit organization, seeks judicial review of the Parks Division's authorization of the Project, contending that…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dep't of Revenue v. Agilent Techs., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Williams v. Department of Public SafetyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Kennett v. Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Fuel Automation v. EnergeraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.