Legal Opinion
Wellman Engineering Co. v. Calderon Automation, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 1965No. 27183PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
Contempt proceedings against defendant-appellee Calderon were dismissed, sua sponte, by the Court of Common Pleas after hearing plaintiff’s, Wellman’s, evidence in support of its motion to show cause and arresting the testimony started on behalf of Calderon.
The contemptuous conduct claimed by Wellman related to the alleged failure of Calderon to abide by the terms of an order of this Court of Appeals dated March 12, 1964. This latter order was remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for execution under the provisions of Section 2505.36, Revised Code.
Appeal is made to us on questions of law from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lamb v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re RichardsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Gibson v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Loney v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1917
- Jastram v. McAuslanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Masonite Corp. v. International WoodworkersMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- In re Contemnor Caron, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2000
- State ex rel. Henneke v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1993