Legal Opinion
Rockwell International v. Reed
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1990No. 74674PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ADAMS, Presiding Judge:
Frank Howard Reed (Claimant) filed his Form 3 on March 16, 1988, alleging hearing loss due to cumulative trauma caused by continuous exposure to plant noise. Rockwell International (Employer) admitted Claimant’s period of employment, including the alleged date of last exposure, but denied any on-the-job injury. In addition, Employer claimed as defenses lack of notice and statute of limitations. Claimant contended the statute of limitations was tolled by Employer’s failure to advise him of his right to file a claim. After hearing the evidence, the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marley Cooling Tower Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Carter v. McDonnell DouglasCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Zinc Corp. of America v. McCallisterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991