Legal Opinion
State v. Woodrow
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 2011No. Nos. 20100334, 20100337, 20100335, 20100336PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from a district court order granting Michael Woodrow’s motion to dismiss five counts of gross sexual imposition, class A felonies, based on a lack of jurisdiction. Because we conclude the district court has jurisdiction under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-34(8), we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In December 2007, the State filed a summons and amended petition in the juvenile court alleging Woodrow committed five counts of gross sexual imposition. The juvenile court subsequently entered an order transferring jurisdiction for all five counts to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. P.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Divide County Sheriff's Department ex rel. Throntveit v. M.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- In re M.A.V.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Juvenile Officer v. P.S.L.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Divide County Sheriff's Department v. M.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- State v. G.C.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. G.C.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019