Medlock v. Gibson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Floyd Allen Medlock, a prisoner challenging a death sentence in Oklahoma, sought habeas review in federal district court of his state conviction and sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Medlock brings numerous claims before us after the denial of his petition and the issuance of a certificate of appealability by the district court. His claims are duplicative, and we reduce them to three: the district court erred in concluding the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) applies to Medloek’s habeas petition; the district court should have granted habeas relief based…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Bland v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Thomas v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Romano v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Hale v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Wilson v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.