Legal Opinion

Medlock v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2000No. 99-6089PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

Floyd Allen Medlock, a prisoner challenging a death sentence in Oklahoma, sought habeas review in federal district court of his state conviction and sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Medlock brings numerous claims before us after the denial of his petition and the issuance of a certificate of appealability by the district court. His claims are duplicative, and we reduce them to three: the district court erred in concluding the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) applies to Medloek’s habeas petition; the district court should have granted habeas relief based…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Bland v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Thomas v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Romano v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Hale v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Wilson v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API