Legal Opinion

Romano v. Gibson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 13, 2001No. 99-6310, 99-6323PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

These death penalty appeals 1 present a number of issues. The most difficult, which we deal with at some length, include: 1) whether the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by failing to disclose a detective’s unrecorded recollection of the temperature of the victim’s apartment; 2) what degree of mental torture or conscious serious physical abuse preceding death is necessary to satisfy Oklahoma’s especially heinous, atrocious or cruel aggravating factor; and 3) the extent to which defense counsel, under Strickland v.…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Cargle v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Meier Jason BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Duckett v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Littlejohn v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API