Legal Opinion

Severt v. . Lyall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill., J.

When the owner of land, subject to an outstanding life 'estate, predeceases the life tenant, intestate and without issue, who inherits his interest in the land? Is the roll called and his heirs ascertained as of the date of his death or as of the date of the later death of the life tenant ? These are the questions presented on this appeal.

The court below concluded that the roll is called as of the date of the death of the remainderman and that, therefore, title to the locus in quo, upon the death of Clarence Odell Severt, descended to and vested in the feme defendants. "We concur.

Under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chas. W. Priddy & Co. v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Tyndall v. . TyndallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Early v. Early.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. King v. . ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Lawrence v. . PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Byerly v. TolbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API