Byerly v. Tolbert
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The jury’s answer to the issue submitted simply declares .a fact that -is admitted by all parties.
The basic question is whether the fact that Sandra Louise Tolbert was bom more (than ten lunar months after the intestate’s death establishes conclusively as a matter of law that she is not entitled to a 'child’s share in the 'distribution of the intestate’s estate. If not, 'appellant, upon offering evidence sufficient to warrant an affirmative answer, was entitled to have the issue he tendered submitted to the jury.
We need not consider whether the count erred in excluding the proffered testimony…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lamm v. LorbacherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . ForteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Britton v. . Miller and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- County of Lenoir ex rel. Dudley v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Urena v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025