Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 10, 2001No. 19149-4-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The “present sense impression” exception *778to the hearsay rule permits the admission of a “statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.” ER 803(a)(1). The trial judge here admitted testimony from police of statements made by a confidential informant (Cl) who was not available to testify at the trial. The police witnesses testified that the informant’s cocaine supplier was “Ramon,” that Ramon frequently arrived in a blue and white Chevy Blazer, and that the Cl identified the same Blazer when it…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deparvine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. HudlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. Rangel-ReyesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. O'HARACourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API