Legal Opinion
State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 10, 2001No. 19149-4-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 P.3d 1062 (2001)
105 Wash.App. 775
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Rafael Delamora MARTINEZ, Appellant.
No. 19149-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
April 10, 2001.
Russell R. Abrutyn, Antonio Salazar, Seattle, for Appellant.
Terry J. Bloor, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Kennewick, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
The "present sense impression" exception to the hearsay rule permits the admission of a "statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter." ER 803(a)(1). The trial…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deparvine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. HudlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. Rangel-ReyesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. O'HARACourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. O'HaraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.