Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Long Lake Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1943No. 10368PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board petitions for our decree enforcing its order directed toward respondents. The order is predicated on findings that the respondents *364interfered with and coerced their employees in the exercise of rights guaranteed under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and refused to bargain collectively with a union — a local of International Woodworkers of America, affiliated with C. I. O. — to which most of the respondents’ employees adhered. Respondents were ordered by the Board to desist from these practices, were directed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Condenser Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Anglim v. Empire Star Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Butler Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Grower-Shipper Vegetable Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manley Transfer Company, Inc. And Kansas Delivery Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Alaska Roughnecks and Drillers Association v. National Labor Relations Board, Mobil Oil Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Holtville Ice & Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Northwestern Mut. Fire Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Walling v. Wabash Radio Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1946