Legal Opinion
Gurwitz v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided February 2, 1961No. Claim No. 35816; Claim No. 35817; Claim No. 35834; Claim No. 35894; Claim No. 35895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del Giorno, J.
The above claims were consolidated for the purpose of trial with the stipulation that separate judgments be entered by the court. Except for the fee claim of Jack Brause v. State of New York, the others were all fixture claims by tenants located in the building owned by Brause.
Reuben Gurwitz conducted a stationery and luncheonette store: Martin Jablon conducted a pharmacy; Aber-Dulberg, Inc., conducted a supermarket grocery and Morganthal was its sub-lessee as owner of the butcher department; East Hill Cleaners and Dyers conducted a dry-cleaning store, doing its own dry cleaning. A schedule…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Potter v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- In re WillcoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Tinnerholm v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Schnaible v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re H & S Manufacturing Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Richards-Dowdle, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.