Legal Opinion
Tinnerholm v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided November 3, 1958No. Claim No. 34672; Claim No. 34801PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del Giobno, J.
The several requests to find and conclusions of law submitted by the claimants and the State marked by the court as found or refused are adopted by the court and shall be considered in conjunction with the memorandum-decision. Other requests are marked refused except as found for the reason that they may not be indicative of the court’s decision herein.
Tinnerholm’s claim is solely for the value of the permanent appropriation of an almost rectangular parcel of land located on the southwest corner of Conduit Boulevard or Sunrise Highway and Windsor Avenue, Rockville Centre. It had a frontage of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William C. Atwater & Co. v. Panama RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Matter of City of New York (Allen St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Eighth Avenue Coach Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Becker v. Peter A. Frasse & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marraro v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Rochester Poster Advertising Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
- McKenzie v. Western Greenbrier BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Gottfried v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960
- Gurwitz v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.