Legal Opinion

Oukrop v. Wasserburger

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1988No. 86-306PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The critical question to be resolved in this case is whether the expert testimony of a pharmacologist-toxicologist is relevant in a case involving toxic injuries to a human being from a drug overdose when the expert testimony consists of an interpolation of the results of experiments on animals in the absence of empirical data with respect to people. There is a collateral procedural issue as to whether the expert testimony was a surprise to the defendant attributable to a failure to designate properly the expert witness in accordance with the pre-trial order. The trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Arthur Clark v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Arnold v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kobos by and Through Kobos v. EvertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Law v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Contreras Ex Rel. Contreras v. Carbon County School District 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Winterholler v. ZolessiWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API