Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1917No. 1773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The action of the trial court in admitting and excluding testimony is the basis of the assignments numbered 1 to 13, inclusive, in- appellant’s brief. The contentions presented by these assignments will be disposed of in the order in which they are made in the brief.

1. The claim that the court permitted appellee as a witness to testify over appellant’s objection to a statement she made to third persons about being engaged to appellant is not supported by the record. It appears from the bill of exceptions that appellee testified without objection on the part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Vanderpool v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Lewis v. TapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  4. Houser v. CarmodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cox v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Coombs v. FazzioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Belm v. PatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. The Praetorians v. RedmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Johnson v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API