Legal Opinion

Vanderpool v. Richardson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This suit was instituted for breach of promise, of marriage. The plaintiff recovered judgment, which is now brought here by writ of error.

The promise is alleged to have been made in 1878 while plaintiff was residing with her father in California. The *338father testified on her behalf that early in January, 1879, the defendant came to him and, after remarking that he supposed his attentions to the plaintiff must be known to the witness, went on to say that he had her consent to become his wife, and now desired the consent of her father. The consent was given, and defendant said he should go to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lane v. Kindercare Learning Centers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Willis v. New World Van Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API