State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Defendants are juveniles who were convicted of crimes described in the mandatory sentencing provisions of Ballot Measure 11 (Measure 11), which the voters adopted at the 1994 general election. Or Laws 1995, ch 2, codified at ORS 137.700 (amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 421, § 1; Or Laws 1995, ch 422, § 47). They were sentenced in accordance with its provisions. On appeal, defendants challenge the applicability of Measure 11 to them on a number of statutory and constitutional grounds. We affirm.
Section 1 of Measure 11 provides, in part:
“(1) When a person is convicted of one of the offenses listed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Oregon Education Ass'n v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Stubbs v. WeathersbyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.