Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1996No. C9505-33548; CA A90787PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery in the first degree. He attacks the 90-month mandatory minimum sentence that he received under Measure 11, which the voters adopted at the 1994 general election. Or Laws 1995, ch 2, codified at ORS 137.700 (amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 421, § 1; Or Laws 1995, ch 422, § 47). Under the sentencing guidelines, the presumptive sentence would have been in a range of 61 to 65 months. We affirm.

We considered and rejected defendant’s arguments that Measure 11 violated the separation of powers provisions of Article III, section 1, of the Oregon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeAngelo v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. Ferman-VelascoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API