Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Markulin

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 25, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam Kapelman, J.

Plaintiffs, landlords, sue defendants, former tenants, to recover (1) $100 — rent for month of October, 1962, for commercial space decontrolled (2) $110 for damages to premises during defendants’ occupancy. Defendants plead a general denial and counterclaim for $150 — against plaintiffs alleging that plaintiffs had agreed to pay defendants said sum for painting premises, which plaintiffs have refused to pay although payment therefor was duly demanded.

After trial, findings of fact and conclusions of law having-been waived, upon all of the credible evidence, judgment for plaintiffs in the sum-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Carolina Leasing Co. v. AllenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
  2. 4145 Corp. v. BrownAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  3. Farrell v. WoodwardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  4. Fordham Hill Associates v. FiebachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  5. Giordano v. LoperfideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SeidlerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  2. Lantz v. MetaxasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  3. Spencer v. FaulknerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. 62 Spruce Street Realty Co. v. MurrayNassau County District Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API