Legal Opinion

4145 Corp. v. Brown

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 11, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Where a landlord notifies a tenant of decontrolled premises that if he holds over after the expiration of his lease, he will have to pay an increased rental and the tenant does continue to remain in the premises after the term expires, then the law will imply from such holding over an agreement by the tenant to accept such new terms. The fact that the tenant may have expressed his objections to such an increase will be of no avail if after the expiration of his term he continues in possession. The landlord is not precluded from seeking an increase by his acceptance of rent on account.

The…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fordham Hill Associates v. FiebachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
  2. Rita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SeidlerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  3. Aronson v. MarkulinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  4. Housing Authority of East Orange v. LeffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Reimer v. KaslovCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API