Love v. Kradel (In Re Love)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND PROPOSED ORDER
THOMAS W. LAWLESS, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue before the Court is whether the Debtor may avoid the interest retained by the vendor of real property under an installment land contract involving the Debtor’s purchase of land in Pennsylvania. The parties agreed to stipulate to the facts and submit this matter on briefs. For the reasons set forth below, 1 I hold that the vendor’s interest is not avoidable.
FACTS
On September 2, 1980, Elaine P. Love, a/k/a Elaine L. Goodwin (“Debtor” or “Vendee”) entered into an Article of Agreement (“Agreement”) with Loyal and Juliana…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skendzel v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- McCannon v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Lewis v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fox v. Hill (In Re Fox)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Rowe v. Conners (In Re Rowe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Rusiski v. Pribonic (In Re Pribonic)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Armstrong v. Hustad (In Re Flaten)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1985
- Annis v. First State Bank of Joplin (In Re Annis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.