Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Hustad (In Re Flaten)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota
Decided June 12, 1985No. 19-30067PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM A. HILL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Trustee commenced the present adversary proceeding by Complaint filed with the Court on November 29, 1984, seeking recovery of estate property pursuant to sections 544 and 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Defendants, Marlene and Erik Hustad, filed on December 12, 1984, their Answer denying that the Trustee is entitled to recovery of the property, contending that the Debtor never had an interest in the property which would have passed to the bankruptcy estate upon the filing of the bankruptcy case. The Court permitted the Trustee to file on May 1,1985,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McCannon v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Laminated Veneers Co., Inc. v. BassinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Woodward v. McCollumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Missouri Breaks, LLC v. BurnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,782 Janet Watkins v. Gregory L. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Armstrong v. John Deere Co. (In Re Gilbertson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1988
- Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc. v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co. (In Re Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Northern Acres, Inc. v. Hillman State Bank (In Re Northern Acres, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.