Legal Opinion

United States v. Jason Oma Milam, United States of America v. Dewayne Lee Milam

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2006No. 04-4224, 04-4225PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge Niemeyer wrote the opinion, in which Judge Gregory joined. Judge Shedd wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.

In these cases, we hold that facts stated in a presentence report may not, at sentencing, be deemed to be admissions by the defendant sufficient to bypass the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial as articulated in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), even though the defendant, who had been given the presentence report before sentencing, did not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Donathan Wayne HaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Jeffrey CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. KellamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Joseph Junior RevelsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API