Legal Opinion
United States v. Kellam
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2009No. 07-4863, 07-4902PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DUNCAN joined.
OPINION
KING, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Charceil Kellam and Adelson Michel appeal from criminal judgments entered against them in the Western District of Virginia, arising from their involvement in a drug distribution conspiracy. Kellam contends that the district court erred in five ways — in dismissing Michel from Count Eight, in denying her motion to suppress, by refusing to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial, in declining to award…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Rice v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Mohammad HassanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Miguel ZelayaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Gregory BartkoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. LlamasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.