Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Transou

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 30, 1955No. 750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.

A motion to strike allegations in a defendant’s answer, as a matter of right, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 1-153, comes too late when it is not made until the case is calendared for trial or until the jury has been selected and impaneled. Warren v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank, 214 N.C. 206, 198 S.E. 624. But when a motion to strike is not made in apt time, the court has discretionary power to allow or deny such motion, and its ruling will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Parrish v. R. R., 221 N.C. 292, 20 S.E. 2d 299. No abuse of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Warren v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Garris v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Triplett v. . LailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Candler v. SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Bolin v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. McDaniel v. FordhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API