Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Vancil

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1893No. 82PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

Suit by appellee, Bertie Vancil, against appellant, to recover damages for the value of the use of a trunk and contents (being wearing apparel, etc.) during the time the same was unreasonably delayed by defendant. The value of such use is laid at $250. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $125. Defendant appealed.

The plaintiff, Bertie Vancil, a single lady, of age, resident of Gonzales County, Texas, intending to go to her brother, about sixteen miles from Ballinger, on a visit for several months (and to accompany a sister who was in feeble health), reached San…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heiligmann v. RoseTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fredenburgh v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. GrundyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. FugattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Brooks v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API