Legal Opinion

Heiligmann v. Rose

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1891No. 6947PublishedCited by 35 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Judge, Section B.

This case originated in the Justice Court, and was tried on appeal in the District Court of Bexar County at its February term, 1889, when judgment was rendered in appellees’ favor against appellant for the sum of $75 and costs of suit. FTo written pleadings are in the record except a statement, of appellees’ demand, wherein they charge that appellant wickedly and maliciously poisoned five dogs, for which they ask a recovery of damages against appellant in the sum of $25 for each of said dogs as actual damages and $75 exemplary damages.

Appellant assigns as error the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. L. N. Brunswig & Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. A. H. Belo & Co. v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ramsey v. HurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Newman v. DodsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Sparks v. DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gilbert Wheeler, Inc. v. Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas), L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Carla Strickland v. Kathryn and Jeremy MedlenTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Sundquist v. Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of MinnesotaIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API