Legal Opinion

T.P.C. v. B.J.M.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 990282PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] B.J.M. appeals from the trial court’s judgment changing her minor child’s surname and ordering equal payment of guardian ad litem and psychological examination expenses. We affirm.

[¶ 2] This case arises from a paternity action. On July 16, 1998, B.J.M. (“the mother”) gave birth to C.J.M (“the minor child”). On its birth certificate, the minor child was given the mother’s surname, which is also the surname of the mother’s ex-husband. T.P.C. (“the father”) is the minor child’s biological father. The father and the mother are not and never have been married to each other.

[¶…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bobo v. JewellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sabot v. Fargo Women's Health Organization, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Walbert v. WalbertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Iverson v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Snyder v. SnyderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Edwardson v. LauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Superpumper, Inc. v. Nerland Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. E.R.J. v. T.L.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API