Legal Opinion

Key v. Jewel Companies, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1988No. 87-3881PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This is an appeal from an order granting defendant Jewel Companies’ motion to strike class action allegations from plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Interlocutory appeal was allowed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308. (107 Ill. 2d R. 308.) The following questions were certified for appeal:

“(1) Whether the trial court erred under section 2 — 801 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure in granting defendant’s motion to strike class allegations on the grounds that:

Any common questions of law in this case are overshadowed by both questions of fact and particular applications of the law that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Barliant v. Follett Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Morrissy v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Schlenz v. CastleIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lamkin v. TownerIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Chicago v. Michigan Beach Housing CooperativeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Weiss v. Waterhouse Securities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Clark v. PFIZER INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API