Legal Opinion

Clark v. PFIZER INC.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2010No. 754 EDA 2009PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ALLEN, J.:

¶ 1 Gregory Clark and Linda Meashey, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated (“Appellants”), appeal from the trial court’s February 9, 2009 order decertifying the class action and granting partial summary judgment in favor of Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company, LLC (“Defendants”). We affirm the trial court’s order to the extent that it decerti-fied the class, concluding that Appellants cannot satisfy the commonality and typicality requirements because individual issues of reliance and/or causation predominated the class’ claims. We vacate the trial…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Kern v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. McGrogan v. First Commonwealth BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API