Legal Opinion

Schachter v. Quinones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*506The record reveals that the petitioner commenced the instant proceeding to compel the respondent to perform numerous acts with respect to the resolution of the petitioner’s administrative appeal from a determination denying his Freedom of Information Law request for access to certain documents. Contrary to the petitioner’s present contentions, the Supreme Court, Kings County, properly dismissed the proceeding. It is well settled that a proceeding in the nature of mandamus to compel "lies only where there is a clear legal obligation to perform the official act sought to be compelled” (Matter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lentlie v. EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Matter of Burr v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Ames Department Stores v. Assessor of Town of ConcordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Lentlie v. EganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. County of Nassau v. HeineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ritangela Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API