Legal Opinion

United States v. David R. Knapp, United States of America v. Grk Corporation, Dba Knapp Ford Mercury

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1997No. 94-10022, 94-10023PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed May 9, 1997 is withdrawn.

OPINION

KING, District Judge:

Appellants David R. Knapp and GRK Corporation d/b/a Knapp Ford/Mercury (collectively “Knapp”) appealed jointly from a conviction and sentence for (1) conspiracy to money launder, 18 U.S.C. § 371; (2) money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i); and (3) filing false currency transaction reports, 26 U.S.C. §§ 60501(f)(1)(B) and 7206(1) & (2). We affirmed in an unpublished disposition. United States v. Knapp, 52 F.3d 335 (9th Cir.1995). Knapp petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiora-ri. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. John Woodley, United States of America v. John WoodleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. Guillermo VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. George Michael ShipseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Terrill DixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API