Legal Opinion

S. C. Jones Co. v. Yawn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1936No. 25813PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. "A man can not heedlessly rush into grave peril of the existence of which he is perfectly aware, and then hold any one else, whether negligent or not, responsible for the consequences,” since thus to take "knowingly and deliberately . . a risk, the danger of which, to any person of common prudence, would have been plain and obvious,” constitutes such contributory negligence as will prevent a recovery. City of Columbus v. Griggs, 113 Ga. 597 (38 S. E. 953, 84 Am. St. R. 257); Reid v. So. Ry. Co., 52 Ga. App. 508, 510 (183 S. E. 849). But questions of diligence and negligence, including…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mann v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Tybee Amusement Co. v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. City of Columbus v. GriggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Samples v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Buffington v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foy v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Eidson v. FelderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Hanson v. Atlanta Lodge No. 78, B. P. O. Elks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Courson v. Atlanta, Birmingham Coast Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API