Eidson v. Felder
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
1. We will first deal with the question raised in ground 5 of the demurrer, to the effebt that Code § 68-303 (f). is too indefinite and vague to establish a lawful rule of conduct in the operation of a motor vehicle on the public highway. Counsel for neither party cite us to any decisions. We have been unable to find any Georgia decisions directly in point. It is our opinion that the statute is not subject to the attack made. What distance from the point from which the turn is expected to be made the arm should be extended, and as to what length of time it is to be kept extended, in our…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mann v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Bonner v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Reed v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. OuztsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Perry v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Garnto v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Archer v. Aristocrat Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.