Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 5, 1956No. 36255PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

Under the rules for properly pleading the agency relationship between a corporation and its employees, which have been so cogently stated by MacIntyre, P. J., in Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 81 Ga. App. 324 (58 S. E. 2d 559), the petition was, upon this point, sufficient as against demurrer, either general or special. There are in the petition simple direct statements of fact in the nature of express general averments that the negligent acts of the employees of the defendant here in question were committed in the prosecution of the defendant’s business and within the scope of their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conney v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Smith v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  4. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  5. McEntire v. PangleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Jones v. Reserve InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Roberts v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API