Ford v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Pickering, J.:
Jerome Ford appeals his conviction of pandering of prostitution, a felony. He contends that the statute under which he was convicted, NRS 201.300(l)(a), is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. His challenge proceeds from a misinterpretation of the statute. NRS 201.300(l)(a) does not impose strict liability on a person who unintentionally causes another to engage in prostitution — say, the actress who romanticized prostitution in the movie Pretty Woman. It criminalizes the act of soliciting another person with the specific intent that, in response to the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Clancy v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Las Vegas Development Group, LLC v. YfantisDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Building Energetix Corp. v. EHE, LPNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dion Washington-DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.