Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2011No. 52272PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Pickering, J.:

Jerome Ford appeals his conviction of pandering of prostitution, a felony. He contends that the statute under which he was convicted, NRS 201.300(l)(a), is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. His challenge proceeds from a misinterpretation of the statute. NRS 201.300(l)(a) does not impose strict liability on a person who unintentionally causes another to engage in prostitution — say, the actress who romanticized prostitution in the movie Pretty Woman. It criminalizes the act of soliciting another person with the specific intent that, in response to the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Clancy v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Las Vegas Development Group, LLC v. YfantisDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
  4. Building Energetix Corp. v. EHE, LPNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dion Washington-DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API