Legal Opinion

United States v. Keeney

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 17, 1953No. Cr. 870-52PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

In view of the importance and the novel character of the questions presented in this case,, the Court will state its views on the motion for a judgment of acquittal, made by defense counsel, somewhat more fully than it ordinarily does.

This is a prosecution for a contempt of Congress brought under U.S.C.A., Title 2, Section 192, the contempt consisting of a refusal on the part of the defendant to answer a question, while testifying before a Special Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate, on February 25,1952.

The question which the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. B & O RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
  2. Mary Jane Keeney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Carolyn Mullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Carolyn Mullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  5. Mary Jane Keeney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API