Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carolyn Mullen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 29, 1959No. 14663Published

1ConcurrenceFahy, Circuit Judge

In concurring I add that another ground for reversal is urged by appellant, namely, the admission in evidence of the testimony of a minister of statements made to the minister by the appellant as a penitent in preparation for receiving communion as a Lutheran communicant. Not desiring to delay the decision, I will file at a later date a statement of my views on the question of the admissibility of this testimony.

Statement by Circuit Judge Fahy, with Whom Circuit Judge Edgerton Concurs, and Separate Statement by Circuit Judge Edgerton, on the Question of the Admissibility of Certain Testimony.

J…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API