Legal Opinion

Smith v. B & O Railroad

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 25, 1979No. Civ. Y-78-26PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

Wallace T. Smith and others seek declaratory, injunctive and punitive and compensatory monetary relief against the defendants, The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter “B & 0”), The Western Maryland Railway Company (hereinafter “Western Maryland”), and United Transportation Union (hereinafter “United”). The defendants have moved for summary judgment, the plaintiffs have moved for certification of a class and for an order compelling discovery.

I. THE FACTS

Plaintiff Smith, an employee of B & 0 is chairman of Local 600 of United’s East End Cumberland…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Dorothy P. Robinson v. Lorillard Corporation (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Paxton v. Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Dameron v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  4. In re Kirschner Medical Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  5. Peoples v. Wendover Funding, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API