Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Gies

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The defendant, at and before the time this suit was brought, was the manager of a public restaurant in the city of Detroit, and was licensed by that munici*359pality to conduct such public restaurant. It was to all intents and purposes a public place. On August 15, 1889, the plaintiff, a colored man, in company with a friend, entered this restaurant, and; sitting down at one of the tables provided for that purpose, ordered supper. The plaintiff claims, in substance, that the restaurant was divided in two parts, not separate rooms, but one side or part of the room was known as the “restaurant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People, Ex Rel. King v. . GallagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. People ex rel. Workman v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Donnell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Anderson v. Pantages Theatre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. 303 Creative LLC v. ElenisSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API