Legal Opinion

Kombea Corp. v. Noguar L.C.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 23, 2014No. Case No. 2:13-CV-957 TSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff KomBea Corporation’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment declaring the invalidity of United States Patents Nos. 8,503,619; 7,933,387; 8,438,494; and 7,640,510 under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Court heard oral argument on Plaintiffs Motion on December 9, 2014. For the reasons discussed more fully below, the Court will grant Plaintiffs Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant Noguar L.C. (“Noguar”) holds United States Patents Nos. 8,503,619 (the “'619…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Ddr Holdings, LLC v. hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada (u.s.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Vehicle Intelligence & Safety LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Epic Technology, LLC v. Fitnow, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API