Legal Opinion

Epic Technology, LLC v. Fitnow, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 7, 2015No. Case No. 2:15-CV-00442-DBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON FITNOW’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Dee Benson, United States District Judge

Epic Technology, LLC (“Epic”) owns a patent — No. -8,275,633- (’633. patent)— claiming -methods and systems for providing real time health information utilizing a bar code or RF ID reader on a handheld device. Epic sued Fitnow, Inc. (“Fitnow’,’) for infringement of the ’633 patent. Fitnow filed this Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Fitnow’s Motion”), asserting that the ’633 patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C, § 101 for claiming subject matter that is ineligible for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro OyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017