Legal Opinion

Cummings v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1951No. 33753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Code (Ann. Supp.) § 58-207, providing for the seizure of contraband vehicles, contains in subparagraph (g), as to the intervention of parties at interest, the following: “The holder of any bona fide lien on the property so seized shall be protected to the full extent of his lien; Provided such holder shows that the illegal use of the property was without his knowledge, connivance or consent, express or implied.” The State in its pleadings admitted that the owner was unknown to it. Facts alleged in a pleading are available to the adversary as admissions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Munroe v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Georgia Coast & Piedmont Railroad v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Maynard v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. PLANTERS RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Reed v. Batson-Cook CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Read v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Wood v. Yancey BrothersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Roach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API