Georgia Coast & Piedmont Railroad v. Herrington
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. October 9,1913.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. There is no allegation in the petition for certiorari that the admissibility of the copies of the documentary evidence was questioned in the justice’s court, nor is it alleged that any ruling was invoked upon the admission of this testimony; and for this reason the judge of the superior court was without jurisdiction to consider these objections, raised for the first time in the petition and upon review. Southern Railway Co. v. Davis, 99 Ga. 613 (25 S. E. 880).
2. A verdict which is entirely without any evidence to support it is contrary to law, but a verdict based on secondary evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Boroughs v. White & StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. CarsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Shirley v. Rounsaville & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Southern Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morgan v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Bull & Son v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Bailey v. NewberryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Acme Fast Freight Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Maynard v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.