Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Palmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1953No. 32379PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

Before the entry of the decree divorcing these parties, they agreed that the custody of four minor children should be awarded to them jointly, but that the children should live with plaintiff, except during stated vacation periods when they should be with defendant. This agreement was followed in the custody provisions of the decree entered June 18, 1951. Both parties petitioned for modification of these provisions in this proceeding.

The trial court denied defendant’s petition because of her failure to prove her fitness to have the children. It granted plaintiff’s prayer for sole custody of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Carfa v. AlbrightWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Eickerman v. EickermanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Lorang v. LorangWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In re the Marriage of BueckingWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Johns v. JohnsWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Tupper v. TupperWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Farris v. FarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API