Legal Opinion

Good v. Born

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1946No. 11646PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

The suit is for damages to person and property alleged to have been sustained in a collision between two automobiles at the edge of the town of Alamo, on Highway 83 in Hidalgo County. At the point of collision Highway 83 occupies three paved lanes, each eleven feet wide. The day was clear, the road straight. The two cars involved were traveling in opposite directions and, with one possible exception, there was no other traffic to obstruct or confuse the vision of the drivers of the two cars. Earl Born, plaintiff below and appellee here, accompanied by his wife, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. DardenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Collins v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leatherwood Drilling Co. v. TXL Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. City of Houston v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Boddy v. CanteauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Harrison v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API